Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-06-03 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is just a bit better than the HTC One ME, having a global score of 78.1 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge design is newer and incredibly thinner than the HTC One ME's, but it's also a little heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
The HTC One ME counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 2560 x 1440 resolution, the HTC One ME also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. HTC One ME features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the HTC One ME also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S7 edge features a much better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a camera with much less megapixels, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has better battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The Galaxy S7 edge is more expensive than HTC One ME, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.