Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is much better than HTC One ME, having an 83.3 score against 73.5. The Galaxy S9 is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner phone than HTC One ME, but it's also just a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a greater hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has 1 GB more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
HTC One ME has just a bit better display than Galaxy S9, although it has a little bit worse 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a little smaller display and a little worse display pixels density. HTC One ME counts with a bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
Galaxy S9 counts with a little longer battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 6% greater battery capacity. The Galaxy S9 takes better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution, a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs and a back camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.