Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is much better than HTC One ME's overall score of 73.5. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0, providing the user some extra features. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is much newer than HTC One ME, it's extremely heavier and a little thicker.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a little faster processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 7 more CPU cores. HTC One ME counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher screen pixel density.
The Galaxy XCover Pro shoots better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a lot smaller sensor giving a lot lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a higher 25 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
HTC One ME has a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much longer battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro costs a lot more than HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.