Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is way better than HTC One ME's 73.5 global score. Galaxy Z Flip's design is notably newer and notably thinner than the HTC One ME's, but it is also heavier. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
HTC One ME counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a better processor than HTC One ME, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes much better videos and photos than HTC One ME, because although it has a worse video quality, a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors and a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features greater battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC One ME. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and buy the HTC One ME, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.