Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum |
| $ 249.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than HTC One ME, with a global score of 92.3 against 73.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat heavier than the HTC One ME, it's much thinner and also noticeably newer. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior CPU than HTC One ME, because it has 7 more cpu cores and more RAM memory. The HTC One ME has a much better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher screen pixel density.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has improved battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than HTC One ME, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.