Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than HTC One ME, with a 94.6 score against 73.5. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than HTC One ME, it's much thinner and notably newer. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite superior hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The HTC One ME features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a back camera with lot less MP and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way better battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 58% bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One ME. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the HTC One ME, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.