Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-03-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Silver |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is much better than the HTC One ME, with an 82.3 score against 73.5. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a more recent 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0, so it counts with some additional features. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 body is newer and a bit thinner, but also heavier than HTC One ME.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features a greater processing power than HTC One ME, because it has 5 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The HTC One ME has a sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 shoots way better videos and photos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also has a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution, a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments.
HTC One ME has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a much longer battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.