Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has an overall score of 82.9, which is much better than the HTC One ME's overall score of 73.5. These phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has 9.0 Pie version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, so it provides some additional features. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro design is extremely newer and a little thinner than HTC One ME's, although it is also much heavier.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a faster processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. HTC One ME has a brighter display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher screen pixel density.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a bigger camera aperture and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
HTC One ME counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 2 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 41 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.