Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than the HTC One ME, with an 86.6 score against 73.5. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a more recent 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's design is way newer than the HTC One ME's, but it's a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a superior processor than HTC One ME, because it has 7 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM. The HTC One ME has a much better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The HTC One ME has a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 2 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots greater photographs and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a larger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations, a camera in the back with way more MP and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a way better battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 66 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.