Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Blasting black |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is way better than HTC One ME, getting a 90.1 score against 73.5. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the newer 10 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, offering lots of additional features. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is extremely newer than HTC One ME's, although it is heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a greater processing power than HTC One ME, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The HTC One ME counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display density.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.