Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-05-06 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Plastic; metal | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is much better than HTC One ME, having an 88.3 score against 73.5. Both phones we are comparing here use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a newer 11 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is incredibly newer than the HTC One ME, it is just a bit thicker and way heavier.
HTC One ME features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels density. The HTC One ME counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 2 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a quite better performance than HTC One ME, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 7 more cpu cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations, a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a way better battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 58% greater battery size.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is way more expensive than the HTC One ME, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.