Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than HTC One ME, getting a general score of 83.8 against 73.5. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a noticeably newer and thinner cellphone than the HTC One ME, although it is heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a superior hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has a higher number of cores and 5 GB more RAM.
The HTC One ME has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a tinier back camera sensor providing a worse image quality and a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features improved battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One ME. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the HTC One ME, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.