Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the HTC One ME, with an 87.9 score against 73.5. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a a lot newer and a little thinner phone than the HTC One ME, but it is incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the newer 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a greater processing power than HTC One ME, because it has 7 more processing cores and more RAM memory. The HTC One ME counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos, a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations.
The HTC One ME counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.