Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is better than the HTC One ME, with an 81.6 score against 73.5. Although Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is notably heavier than the HTC One ME, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has newer 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0, providing you some nice extra features and improved performance.
HTC One ME counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a quite better processing power than HTC One ME, because it has more cores and 3 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera, a bigger camera aperture and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
HTC One ME counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 2 TB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.