Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is slightly better than the HTC One ME, with a 78.2 score against 73.5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One ME's, although it's also heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a more recent 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, giving some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features just a little better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (but slower). HTC One ME has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher display pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S captures better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because it has a larger aperture and a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution. HTC One ME has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a way better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.