Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a general score of 86.1, which is better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro design is incredibly heavier but somewhat thinner than HTC One ME. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a newer 11 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0, providing the user some extra features and a performance increase.
The HTC One ME features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixel density. HTC One ME counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a faster processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.