Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has an overall score of 77.1, which is a little bit better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's body is thinner but way heavier than the HTC One ME. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has the newer 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0.
HTC One ME counts with a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 3 GB lesser RAM. HTC One ME has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower 2560 x 1440px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch of display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.