Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2022-11-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is way better than HTC One ME, getting a 91.5 score against 73.5. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a more recent 12 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer body is way newer and just a little bit thinner, but much heavier than the HTC One ME.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a better performance than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. HTC One ME has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer captures much clearer photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures, a back facing camera with much more MP and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a bit bigger storage for applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a much better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.