Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| Gold and Gray | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.58 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro is a little bit better than the HTC One ME, with a score of 77.1 against 73.5. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro is incredibly thicker than the HTC One ME, it's a lot lighter and also notably newer. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a newer 13 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
HTC One ME features a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM memory. HTC One ME features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater pixel number per inch of display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because it has a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much larger diafragm aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a really longer battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 76% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.