Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-02-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic; metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro is slightly better than the HTC One ME, having a 75.8 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One ME's, although it is also somewhat heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has 8.0 Oreo version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and performance improvements.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores (although slower). HTC One ME counts with a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
HTC One ME has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 2 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro features a superior battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 41% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro takes slightly better photos and videos than HTC One ME, although it has a way worse 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.