Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a little bit better than HTC One ME, with a general score of 76.6 against 73.5. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is way heavier than HTC One ME, it's a bit thinner and also newer. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the newer 10 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, providing you lots of additional features and better performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit more powerful CPU than HTC One ME, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a greater number of cores. HTC One ME has a lot better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
The HTC One ME features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 2 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots greater photographs and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures, a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a bit more expensive than HTC One ME, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.