Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than the HTC One ME, getting a 79 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S design is extremely newer and a little thinner than the HTC One ME's, although it is also a lot heavier. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a newer 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, so it gives you some extra features and a performance increase.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a little bit better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more cpu cores. HTC One ME has an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The HTC One ME counts with a little bit more storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a greater camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S costs exactly the same than the HTC One ME, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.