Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.4, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.20 x 2.49 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 342 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 500 hours standby time 20.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is way better than the HTC One mini, getting an 83.8 score against 62.6. The Galaxy A50 construction is somewhat thinner but noticeably heavier than the HTC One mini. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a quite superior performance than HTC One mini, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
HTC One mini has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a way smaller screen, a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a way lower 1280 x 720 resolution. The Galaxy A50 counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One mini, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots much better photos and videos than HTC One mini, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a much higher resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC One mini, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than the HTC One mini, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.