Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.1.1, 4.0.4, 4.0.3 | Android 10 |
| 2012-02-26 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.15 x 2.56 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.22 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 430 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way better than the HTC One S, having a global score of 81.1 against 61.7. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version and HTC One S has Android 4.1.1 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a extremely newer phone than HTC One S, although it is thicker and heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better display than HTC One S, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a much higher pixel density and a lot bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better storage for games and applications than HTC One S, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a better performance than HTC One S, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC One S, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 1650mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than HTC One S, because it has a larger aperture, a much higher (4K) video quality and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also cheaper than the HTC One S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.