Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0.3 | Android 4.0 |
| 2012-02-26 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.29 x 2.75 x 0.35 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| S-LCD 2 | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| ULP GeForce (520 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (23 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.68 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket has a general score of 71.5, which is slightly better than HTC One X's 65.2 general score. The Galaxy S III Cricket construction is a bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the HTC One X. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version while HTC One X has Android 4.2.2 version.
The HTC One X has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1280 x 720px, the HTC One X also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One X, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 64 GB.
HTC One X features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with 2 more cores and a much better GPU. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a little longer battery duration than HTC One X, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
The Galaxy S III Cricket captures clearer pictures and videos than HTC One X, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video quality and a camera in the back with an 8 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with better 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.