Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.4 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2, 4.1 | Android 4.0 |
| 2012-10-02 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.29 x 2.75 x 0.35 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| S-LCD 2 | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a little bit better than the HTC One X+, getting a general score of 71.5 against 65.4. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket design is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than HTC One X+. These devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version and HTC One X+ has Android 4.2.2.
The HTC One X+ counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1280 x 720px, the HTC One X+ also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. Galaxy S III Cricket has a processing unit that is just as good as the HTC One X+ one, because although the Galaxy S III Cricket has a lower number of cores, it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory and an extra graphics processor.
HTC One X+ has a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S III Cricket takes better photos and videos than HTC One X+, although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and videos in low-light environments, they both have a back camera with an 8 megapixels, the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the HTC One X+ one.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S III Cricket is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.