Compare phones
HTC Radar
4G T-MobileSamsung Rugby Smart
SGH-I847| Global Score | |
| 54 | 59.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 7.5 Mango 7.5 Mango | Android 2.3.5 |
| 2011-09-01 | 2012-02-23 |
| 4.74 x 2.42 x 0.43 inches | 4.82 x 2.59 x 0.48 inches |
| 4.83 ounces | 4.20 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 140.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.8 inches | 3.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 246 pixels per inch | 252 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | -- |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Single-Core 1400 MHz processor |
| 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.56 | 7.74 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 7.59 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.5 | 4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | 384 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 3.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Rugby Smart has a global score of 59.4, which is a bit better than the HTC Radar's overall score of 54. Samsung Rugby Smart comes with Android 2.3.5 OS, and HTC Radar counts with Windows Phone 7.5 Mango 7.5 Mango OS. Even though Samsung Rugby Smart and HTC Radar were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Rugby Smart design is somewhat thicker but somewhat lighter than HTC Radar.
The Samsung Rugby Smart counts with a little faster CPU than HTC Radar, although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, they both have the same RAM amount and a Single-Core processor. The Samsung Rugby Smart counts with a slightly better looking display than HTC Radar, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 800 x 480, the Samsung Rugby Smart also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Rugby Smart takes much clearer photographs and videos than HTC Radar, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light environments, they both have a camera with a 5 megapixels resolution, the same video frame rate and the same 1280x720 video definition.
The Samsung Rugby Smart counts with a quite bigger memory for applications and games than HTC Radar, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 32 GB. The Samsung Rugby Smart features a little better battery life than HTC Radar, because it has a 9 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Rugby Smart not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.