Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 4.0.3, 2.3.4 | -- |
| 2011-10-31 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.07 x 2.64 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1620mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 293 hours standby time 4.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is much better than HTC Raider 4G, having an 80.7 score against 60.8. Even though the Google Pixel 3 XL is just a little heavier than the HTC Raider 4G, it's incredibly thinner and extremely newer. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a superior CPU than HTC Raider 4G, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a better display than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a really bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a greater camera than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a way more megapixels camera and a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC Raider 4G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 XL features a way better battery life than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a 112% greater battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.