Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.0.3, 2.3.4 | Android 10 |
| 2011-10-31 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.07 x 2.64 x 0.44 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1620mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 293 hours standby time 4.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is much better than HTC Raider 4G's 60.8 overall score. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is much newer, a little bit lighter and way thinner than the HTC Raider 4G. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version and HTC Raider 4G has Android 4.0.3.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a better screen than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a much larger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a way better pixel number per inch in the display. The LG V40 ThinQ features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Raider 4G, because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a very superior processing power than HTC Raider 4G, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior camera than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 12 MP resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a 104% greater battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the HTC Raider 4G, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.