Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 66.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 4.0.3, 2.3.4 | -- |
| 2011-10-31 | 2017-06-22 |
| 5.07 x 2.64 x 0.44 inches | 5.69 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 245 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 8920 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 7.48 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1620mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 293 hours standby time 4.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto E4 is a bit better than the HTC Raider 4G, getting a general score of 66.5 against 60.8. The Motorola Moto E4 is a much newer phone, and it is also thinner and lighter than the HTC Raider 4G. HTC Raider 4G has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto E4, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little less pixels per inch of screen and a lot worse 960 x 540 resolution.
Motorola Moto E4 features a bit better processing unit than HTC Raider 4G, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Motorola Moto E4 counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than HTC Raider 4G, and although they both have equal 16 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto E4 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
Motorola Moto E4 counts with a superior battery duration than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a 2800mAh battery capacity against 1620mAh. The Motorola Moto E4 captures much better videos and photos than HTC Raider 4G. Both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the same video frame rates and a 8 MP camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola Moto E4 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.