Compare phones
HTC Touch CDMA
XV6900Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 37.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 3.97 x 2.34 x 0.54 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7500 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Single-Core 400 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.39 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 0.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 200 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 80.7, which is way better than the HTC Touch CDMA's overall score of 37.7. The Galaxy Note 3 body is noticeably thinner but way heavier than HTC Touch CDMA. Galaxy Note 3 comes with Android 5.0 OS, while HTC Touch CDMA works with Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much better performing CPU than HTC Touch CDMA, because it has an additional graphics processor, 7 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better screen than HTC Touch CDMA, because it has a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a really bigger display and a much higher display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has much more storage to install applications and games than HTC Touch CDMA. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a greater camera than HTC Touch CDMA, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with a much better resolution. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC Touch CDMA, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1100mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.