Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-03-01 | 2022-03-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 overall score. The iPhone SE (2022) design is incredibly newer, just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than HTC U Play. IPhone SE (2022) counts with a quite better processing power than HTC U Play, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone SE (2022) has just a bit better display than HTC U Play, although it has a bit smaller screen, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px and a quite inferior pixel quantity per display inch. The iPhone SE (2022) takes a little bit better videos and photos than HTC U Play, because although it has a way lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a lot better video resolution.
The HTC U Play features a very superior storage for apps and games than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The HTC U Play has longer battery performance than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 2500mAh of battery capacity against 2018mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the iPhone SE (2022) is also cheaper than the HTC U Play.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.