Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2017-03-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than the HTC U Play, having a global score of 84.5 against 73.5. The Apple iPhone XS Max is a newer and a little thinner phone than the HTC U Play, but it is extremely heavier. IPhone XS Max counts with a bit better looking screen than HTC U Play, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the display, a better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a bigger display.
The HTC U Play has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. IPhone XS Max has a quite superior performance than HTC U Play, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM and a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max has better battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 3179mAh battery capacity. IPhone XS Max has a much better camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and a lot higher video resolution.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U Play. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the HTC U Play, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.