Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2017-03-01 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is much better than HTC U Play's 73.5 general score. Google Pixel 2's design has the same thickness than the HTC U Play, but it is a little lighter. Google Pixel 2 features a bit sharper screen than HTC U Play, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each display inch.
The HTC U Play has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 features a little longer battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has an 8 percent greater battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a larger aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.