Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is better than the HTC U Play, with an 81.2 score against 73.5. Motorola Edge 50 is a heavier phone than HTC U Play, but both are equally thin. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better screen than HTC U Play, because it has a just a bit more pixels per display inch, a larger screen and a better 1220 x 2712 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 features a little bit more memory to install games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. HTC U Play features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a back facing camera with a much better 50 MP resolution, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low-light situations. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 100 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.