Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than the HTC U Play, getting a 79.8 score against 73.5. Motorola One Hyper's design is newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than HTC U Play. Motorola One Hyper and HTC U Play both have similar CPUs, and although the Motorola One Hyper has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The HTC U Play counts with a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel count per inch in the display. Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than HTC U Play, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than HTC U Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Motorola One Hyper has a really longer battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 60% larger battery capacity.
Motorola One Hyper not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.