Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-03-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is much better than the HTC U Play's overall score of 73.5. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a notably newer phone than the HTC U Play, but it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A32's processing unit is just as good as the HTC U Play one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A32 has 1 GB more RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The HTC U Play features a better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way better amount of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD card slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A32 has a much better battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 100% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.