Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a general score of 82.3, which is much better than the HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. Samsung Galaxy A60's construction has the same thickness than HTC U Play, but it is heavier. Galaxy A60 counts with just a bit better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A60 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a display that's just as good as the display in HTC U Play, because although the Samsung Galaxy A60 has a little worse pixels amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a larger display. HTC U Play features a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A60 features improved battery life than HTC U Play, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh. Galaxy A60 has a slightly better camera than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy A60 also has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.