Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than HTC U Play's 73.5 overall score. Galaxy A71 5G is a incredibly newer phone than the HTC U Play, but it's way heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy A71 5G features a bit faster CPU than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a screen that's just as good as the display in HTC U Play, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A71 5G captures way better photos and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a camera with much more megapixels, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video.
Galaxy A71 5G has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has an 80% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also cheaper than the HTC U Play, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.