Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is way better than the HTC U Play, with a general score of 90.5 against 73.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is notably newer than HTC U Play, it is just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. The HTC U Play and the Galaxy A90 5G count with similar screens, because although the Galaxy A90 5G has a quite lower pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a bit better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U Play, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has an 80% bigger battery capacity. Galaxy A90 5G features a way better camera than HTC U Play, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.