Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30s is much better than the HTC U Play, with an 83.3 score against 73.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy M30s is extremely newer than the HTC U Play, it is way heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a screen that's just as good as the display in HTC U Play, because although the Samsung Galaxy M30s has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bigger screen.
The HTC U Play features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy M30s has a bit better processor than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy M30s also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy M30s captures a lot better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture, the Galaxy M30s also has a way more MP camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Galaxy M30s features a much better battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.