Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is incredibly heavier than HTC U Play, it's noticeably thinner and notably newer. The HTC U Play counts with a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than HTC U Play, because although it has a just a little worse pixel count in each inch of display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a way larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better videos and photos than HTC U Play, because it has a lot higher video definition, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than HTC U Play, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC U Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U Play. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy HTC U Play, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.