Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| 2017-03-01 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than HTC U Play, getting an 85.5 score against 73.5. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is newer than HTC U Play's, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little more vivid screen than HTC U Play, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better processing power than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a better camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a superior battery life than HTC U Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.