Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-02-21 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) is much better than HTC U Ultra, having a overall score of 86.6 against 77. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) design is incredibly newer, somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra counts with a bit better display than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a larger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a way better pixels quantity per display inch.
The iPhone SE (2022) features a more powerful CPU than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone SE (2022) also has a 64-bits CPU and more cores. Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a camera that is just as good as the camera in HTC U Ultra, and although the Apple iPhone SE (2022) has better video frame rate, they both have the same resolution back facing camera, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition.
The HTC U Ultra features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra features a way better battery performance than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2018mAh.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.