Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2017-02-21 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a score of 80.3 against 77. The Google Nexus 6P is an older and a little bit heavier cellphone than HTC U Ultra, but Google managed to build it just a little thinner anyway. Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Google Nexus 6P has a slightly better display than HTC U Ultra. Both of them have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a same size display and the same pixels density. Google Nexus 6P's camera is very similar to the camera in HTC U Ultra, because although the Google Nexus 6P has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rate and the same back-facing camera sensor size, it also counts with a more MP camera in the back.
HTC U Ultra counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Google Nexus 6P has a little longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Nexus 6P is also the cheapest, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.