Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2017-02-21 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. Google Pixel 2's design has the same thickness than the HTC U Ultra, but it is lighter. The HTC U Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a quite larger screen.
HTC U Ultra has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 2 also has a greater number of faster cores.
HTC U Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size. The HTC U Ultra has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.