Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. LG V50 ThinQ's design is incredibly newer, but a bit heavier and just a little thicker than the HTC U Ultra. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more cpu cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a bit higher pixels density and a little bigger display. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back and the same video resolution, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with better video frame rate and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
The LG V50 ThinQ features more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more internal memory. The LG V50 ThinQ features improved battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.