Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a general score of 77, which is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's overall score of 76.4. The HTC U Ultra body is a lot newer, just a little lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a just a little greater screen density.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo's camera is very similar to the HTC U Ultra one, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has a smaller aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
HTC U Ultra has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. Motorola Droid Turbo has improved battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery size.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.