Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra's score of 77. Even being the best cellphone in this review, the Motorola DROID Turbo body is older, just a little bit heavier and incredibly thicker than the HTC U Ultra. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 CPU cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a brighter screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display. The Motorola DROID Turbo's camera is very similar to the camera in HTC U Ultra, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has slower 24 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a much better 20.7 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The HTC U Ultra features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with improved battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery size.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.