Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, with an 81.2 score against 77. Motorola Edge 50's design has the same thickness than the HTC U Ultra, but it is just a little heavier. HTC U Ultra features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower 1220 x 2712px resolution and a just a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen. The HTC U Ultra has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a much more megapixels camera.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.